The way people discover products is shifting underneath every brand on the internet. AI agents — not humans scrolling through search results — are increasingly making purchasing decisions, comparing options, and executing transactions. A startup called Limy just emerged from stealth with $10 million in seed funding to make sure brands do not disappear from that new equation.

The Raise

Limy announced its seed round on January 28, 2026, led by Flybridge with participation from a16z speedrun, Axiom, Clarim, Communitas, JRV, and AnD Ventures. The round was significantly oversubscribed. Founded in 2024 and headquartered in New York, Limy has a 17-person team with plans to scale to approximately 120 employees within a year.

What Limy Actually Does

CEO Aviv Shamny — alongside co-founders Ido Zabarsky (COO) and Ori Reichman (CTO) — built Limy to solve a problem that barely existed two years ago: how brands appear to AI shopping agents. Traditional SEO optimizes for Google’s search algorithm. Limy optimizes for the agentic web — the emerging layer where large language models act as intermediaries between consumers and products.

The platform lets brands track AI-driven traffic, analyze what prompts lead to their products being recommended, and optimize sentiment and visibility inside LLM outputs. “Every time bots arrive, we understand their intent and guide them to the most relevant content,” Shamny explained to Calcalist Tech.

Unlike tools focused on the consumer side of AI shopping, Limy focuses entirely on the agent side — understanding how AI bots evaluate, compare, and surface brands to end users. Both Shamny and Zabarsky are a16z speedrun scouts, and the founding team brings deep expertise in data science and how LLMs process and rank information.

The Traction Is Already Serious

Limy has approximately 250 large customers generating meaningful revenue on a subscription and usage model. Its client roster includes Fortune 100 names like AstraZeneca, Samsung, and KIA. Some customers are already attributing 10% of their revenue to the platform — a striking figure for a company that just came out of stealth.

For two decades, brands optimized for Google’s algorithm. SEO became a multi-billion-dollar industry because showing up in search results meant revenue. Now the interface is changing. Consumers increasingly get product recommendations from AI chatbots, not search results pages. Traditional SEO does not translate. Google rankings do not determine what ChatGPT recommends. The signals are different. The data pipelines are opaque.

Laterstack Editorial Take

Laterstack exists to sharpen critical thinking by connecting tech, policy, and power to everyday life — across class, industry, and influence. The “neutral AI recommendation” was always temporary. Limy is building the optimization layer that turns AI shopping into the next paid placement ecosystem — and the brands with the deepest pockets will dominate it first. This is the same pattern playing out in ChatGPT’s move toward advertising: the shift from search to AI agents does not eliminate manipulation. It moves it to a layer consumers cannot see.

The real question is not whether LLM-driven commerce is coming. It is who controls the optimization layer. Limy is positioning itself as the SEO of the AI era, and if that comparison holds, the companies that master this visibility game will dominate product discovery for the next decade.

What This Means for Everyday People

If you have ever asked ChatGPT or Perplexity for a product recommendation, the results were not neutral. They were shaped by how well a brand’s data was structured for AI consumption. Limy is building the infrastructure for brands to influence that process deliberately.

For small businesses, this is a warning. The brands with budgets to pay for LLM visibility platforms will be the ones AI agents surface first — just like the startups that moved fastest on cloud infrastructure captured outsized value. The agentic web has gatekeepers. They are just wearing different clothes.

For consumers, the takeaway is simpler: the AI is not neutral. The products it recommends have been optimized to be recommended. Treat AI shopping suggestions the way you already treat Google’s top results — with healthy skepticism.

What is Limy AI?
Limy is an AI commerce infrastructure platform that helps brands optimize their visibility with AI shopping agents and large language models. It tracks AI-driven traffic, analyzes prompts that trigger product recommendations, and improves brand sentiment in LLM outputs.

How is Limy different from traditional SEO?
Traditional SEO optimizes content for search engine algorithms like Google. Limy optimizes for the agentic web — the emerging layer where AI agents powered by LLMs make purchasing decisions and product recommendations on behalf of consumers.

Which companies use Limy?
Limy has approximately 250 large customers including Fortune 100 brands like AstraZeneca, Samsung, and KIA. Some clients attribute up to 10% of their revenue to the platform.


In a San Francisco courtroom, a battle is brewing that could change the way we buy things online. The Amazon Perplexity AI lawsuit challenges whether AI tools can act as personal shoppers, performing real-world tasks on behalf of users.

Amazon claims that Perplexity AI’s Comet bot violated its rules by making purchases without proper disclosure, calling it computer fraud. Perplexity argues that it was simply following user instructions, giving people a faster, smarter way to shop.

This clash is about more than a single website. It could determine whether AI agents will become everyday digital assistants or remain experimental tools restricted by corporate rules.


What is Comet doing?

Comet is a browser-based AI agent that can browse websites, compare products, and complete purchases. Amazon says Comet disguised itself as a regular browser and bypassed security blocks to shop on users’ behalf.

Perplexity insists that Comet only acted with user permission and did not scrape data or train its models on Amazon content. The startup says Amazon is trying to protect its advertising revenue and block competition.

If Amazon wins the case, AI shopping agents may be forced to stop operating on major platforms. If Perplexity wins, AI assistants could become the go-to method for buying anything online, potentially reshaping e-commerce, advertising, and consumer habits.


The stakes for everyday users

The Amazon Perplexity AI lawsuit is about control. Right now, shoppers must navigate websites themselves, compare prices, and manage checkout. AI agents could do all of that automatically.

Imagine telling your assistant to buy a gift under fifty dollars with free shipping. Today you do it manually. Tomorrow, your AI could handle every step for you, saving time and avoiding mistakes.

At the same time, this raises questions. Who is responsible if the AI buys the wrong item? Who guarantees security if the agent acts on your behalf? This case could set the rules for responsibility, liability, and user rights in the AI age.


The corporate angle

Amazon has already tested AI shopping internally. Its tools like Buy For Me and Rufus show that automated assistants can recommend and buy products. The difference is Amazon controls these agents.

Perplexity challenges that monopoly. CEO Aravind Srinivas says people should choose the AI that works best for them, not be forced to use the platform’s own tools. Perplexity also relies heavily on Amazon Web Services, creating an ironic twist: the startup is using Amazon’s infrastructure while being sued by the company.

The result of the Amazon Perplexity AI lawsuit could decide if corporations retain exclusive control over how consumers interact with digital marketplaces, or if AI will be allowed to act independently.


What it means for the future

This lawsuit is not just about shopping. It is a turning point for AI on the internet.

If AI agents are allowed to act autonomously, websites will have to adapt, and new assistants could manage research, bookings, and purchases for millions of people. If they are blocked, digital innovation may slow, and human users will remain responsible for every click.

Either way, the Amazon Perplexity AI lawsuit signals a new era where software negotiates, decides, and acts for us, and where the legal system will determine who controls the future of online action.

Read the original coverage at Bloomberg.

Explore more Laterstack sensational tech stories:

ICC drops Microsoft Office for European open source alternative

The day the Internet stopped: Inside AWS’s massive cloud collapse